You are viewing the site in preview mode

Skip to main content

Table 2 Longitudinal mixed effects models evaluating the effects of the M-DEPTH intervention on depressive symptoms (PHQ-9 score) and depression status (PHQ-9 > 9) over 18 months of post-partum follow-up

From: Effects of M-DEPTH model of depression care on maternal depression, functioning, and HIV care adherence, and infant developmental over eighteen months post-partum: results from a cluster randomized controlled trial

 

PHQ-9 score

Depression status

Joint significance tests

F (df); p

F (df); p

Time

37.0 (3, 998); < 0.0001

7.6 (3, 998); < 0.0001

Time X intervention

20.4 (4, 998); <0.0001

15.7 (4, 998); < 0.0001

Interaction effects

Beta (SE); p

OR (95% CI)

Intervention X Month 2

-4.03 (0.49); <0.0001

0.21 (0.13, 0.36)

Intervention X Month 6

-3.28 (0.50); <0.0001

0.13 (0.07, 0.25)

Intervention X Month 12

-2.89 (0.50); <0.0001

0.23 (0.12, 0.43)

Intervention X Month 18

-3.40 (0.50); <0.0001

0.16 (0.08, 0.33)

  1. SE = standard error; OR = odds ratio; CI = confidence interval; df = degrees of freedom; PHQ-9 = Patient Health Questionnaire (9-item version)
  2. All models included these baseline covariates: age, relationship status (in a committed relationship; yes/no), any secondary schooling (yes/no), newly diagnosed with HIV (yes/no), PHQ-9 score (or depression status (yes/no) for that model) at eligibility screening, undetectable HIV viral load (yes/no). The model specification included time as a categorical variable with indicators for each follow-up assessment (month 2, month 6, month 12, month 18). The joint tests of overall effect of time and intervention are Type 3 tests of fixed effects. The coefficients of the main effects of time are not shown here. The key coefficients of interest are the interaction terms between Intervention and time, which are the (covariate-adjusted) difference between the Intervention (intervention = 1) group and the control group (Intervention = 0); a p-value < 0.05 indicates a statistically significant difference between the means of the two study arms. Further, note that to estimate the mean in the intervention group, one must add the main effect of time to the interaction between intervention and time